Jump to content

Talk:Main Page

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Afterword)
Archives: Sections of this page older than three days are automatically relocated to the newest archive.

001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 020 021 022 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 030 031 032 033 034 035 036 037 038 039 040 041 042 043 044 045 046 047 048 049 050 051 052 053 054 055 056 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 065 066 067 068 069 070 071 072 073 074 075 076 077 078 079 080 081 082 083 084 085 086 087 088 089 090 091 092 093 094 095 096 097 098 099 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207

Main Page error reports

To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.

  • Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
  • Offer a correction if possible.
  • References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
  • Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 04:33 on 7 December 2024) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
  • Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
  • Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
  • No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
  • Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
  • Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.

Errors in the summary of the featured article

Please do not remove this invisible timestamp. See WT:ERRORS and WP:SUBSCRIBE. - Dank (push to talk) 01:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar: It's the RFAA. So "in RAAF's history" should be either "in the RAAF's history" or (better) "in RAAF history". --2A04:4A43:909F:FC64:B8F4:5937:A1E5:6A78 (talk) 00:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As the main editor of the article, I fully agree with the OP -- either option they suggest is better than the way it is now. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 03:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done, the latter suggestion. Stephen 04:33, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Errors with "In the news"

"Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah (pictured) wins the Namibian general election."

How does a person win a general election? Surely her party has won the general election and she has won the presidential election? - Dumelow (talk) 18:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does Namibia have a particular meaning? I don't think general election is limited in that way, at least not in all variations of English. Here, it simply means a regular election where the candidates stand for office. (In the United States, it is primarily contrasted with a primary election) Alanscottwalker (talk) 20:00, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In parliamentary or semi-presidential systems, a general election means all the seats that are up for grabs, not just the presidential position. In the Namibia system, the preidential election is held at the same time as the parliamentary elections, which is run by the parties. I don't think it's accurate to say that the successful presidential candidate has won the general election, because there are all the other seats in play as well. Analogies to the US election system are not helpful here. If a US presidential candidate is successful, but the candidate's parties don't win majorities in the House and the Senate, would you say that the candidate won the general election? They won the general election for president, which is different from the general election for the House and the Senate seats. I think it would be better to say that "Nandi-Ndaitwah won the Namibia presidential election". Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 20:21, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the United States “general election” is the term used to differentiate from a primary election. It’s the term we use to clarify that is not an election solely within a single political party. So yes we would say the president won the general election even if the president’s party overall lost seats in the legislature. That’s American English.4meter4 (talk) 20:37, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, let's use American election terminology for all elections around the world, and not try to reflect usage in other countries or systems. Rule Americana. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 20:50, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think 4 was answering your question, 'would you say' and the answer was, yes. (Although, it would also differentiate from a special election). I was asking what they say in Namibia. Alanscottwalker (talk) 21:57, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be a problem if we say she won the presidential election, while still linking to the general election article? Howard the Duck (talk) 01:33, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in "Did you know ..."

Errors in "On this day"

(December 13)
(December 9)

General discussion

Issue with wide TFA images on mobile

Can someone try to figure out how to fix wide image formatting in the FA blurbs on mobile devices? This has become more and more apparent with recent FAs. Right now for the KARE article, the image has a width that is not quite 100% of the box it is in, but the text is still trying to wrap alongside it in the narrow space that remains. This results in a whopping 2 characters per line appearing for the first 4 lines of the blurb. It is incredibly frustrating as a reader and long-time contributor that mobile layouts can still look like this in 2024. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talkcontributions) 06:10, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably best as a general thread at Talk:Main Page unless there's an issue specific to the KARE image. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 06:15, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with T: this isn't an error in the blurb (which is what this section is for), but a flaw in the structure way beyond the capabilities of any editor to fix - it's something the WMF tech people need to fix. - SchroCat (talk) 08:52, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Moved. Courtesy pings @Y2kcrazyjoker4 and SchroCat. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 08:59, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see the same problem on mobile. I seem to recall that when we've had this problem before, it was simply fixed by putting {{nowrap}} around the problematic text. So in this case, something like:
{{nowrap|'''[[KARE (TV)|KARE]]'''}} {{nowrap|(channel 11)}}
I haven't tested this though. Modest Genius talk 12:43, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]